Thursday, January 10, 2013

GALATIANS - AN INTRODUCTION

J. Vernon McGee writes:
Paul wrote the book of Galatians on his third missionary trip from Ephesus. It's written to a whole area not a specific church.
The area of Galatia is made up of the People's group called Gauls. They were warlike people of Celtic stock from southern France who came down and invaded into this area South and East of Ephesus.
The Gauls were an interesting people that seem to share a lot of the similar characteristics with America. Caesar had described them as “a fickle people in their resolve, fond of change and not to be trusted “.  Sounds much like America, doesn't it? Another writer characterized them as frank, impetuous, impressible, fond of show, intelligent but extremely inconsistent, the fruit of excessive vanity.  There's a pretty accurate picture of the American people. They wanted to make Paul a God one day and the next they wanted to stone him to death.
This is certainly an epistle directed to a people like us. This book is solemn, stern and severe.  This book does not correct conduct as the Corinthian letters do, but it is corrective. The epistle contains no word of commendation, no word of praise, no word of Thanksgiving. There is no request for prayer, no mention of their standing in Christ and no one with him is mentioned by name. The heart of Paul is laid bare. There is deep emotion. Some say the book of Romans comes from the head of Paul while Galatians comes from the heart of Paul.
This book has been the back bone and the back ground of every spiritual movement and great revival that has come in the past 1900 years.
  
MacArthur New Testament Commentary states
The book of Galatians has been conferred with such titles as the Magna Carta of spiritual liberty, the battle cry of the Reformation, and the Christian’s declaration of independence. It is clearly the Holy Spirit’s charter of spiritual freedom for those who have received Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. Many church historians maintain that the foundation of the Reformation was laid with the writing of Martin Luther’s commentary on Galatians. The great German Reformer said, “The epistle to the Galatians is my epistle. To it I am, as it were, in wedlock. Galatians is my Katherine [the name of his wife].” It was out of his careful and submissive study of Scripture, especially the book of Galatians, that Luther discovered God’s plan of salvation by grace working through faith, a plan unalterably contrary to the thousand-year-old Roman Catholic teaching of salvation by works.   
Merrill C. Tenney wrote of Galatians: “Christianity might have been just one more Jewish sect, and the thought of the Western world might have been entirely pagan had it never been written. Galatians embodies the germinal teaching on Christian freedom which separated Christianity from Judaism, and which launched it upon a career of missionary conquest. It was the cornerstone of the Protestant Reformation, because its teaching of salvation by grace alone became the dominant theme of the preaching of the Reformers.” (Galatians [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1957], p. 15.) The message of Galatians is the message of the Christian’s spiritual freedom, his deliverance by Christ from the bondage of sin and religious legalism. Its message is particularly relevant in our own day, as personal freedom has become the dominant emphasis of countless philosophies both within and without Christendom. Perhaps because Paul was so intensely concerned about the matter of gracious salvation in Christ and about the violent attacks on the gospel being made by the Judaizers, Galatians is the only one of his epistles that gives no word of commendation to its readers. After a brief salutation, the apostle immediately states the problem that prompted the letter: “I am amazed that you are so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel; which is really not another; only there are some who are disturbing you, and want to distort the gospel of Christ” (1:6-7). From that point until the closing benediction (6:18) the letter is a flashing sword wielded by a burning heart. At first thought it seems strange that Paul would have words of commendation for the worldly, divisive, immoral, and immature Corinthian believers and yet have none for the saints of Galatia. To the Corinthians he wrote, “I thank my God always concerning you, for the grace of God which was given you in Christ Jesus, that in everything you were enriched in Him, in all speech and all knowledge, even as the testimony concerning Christ was confirmed in you, so that you are not lacking in any gift, awaiting eagerly the revelation of our Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Cor. 1:4-7). But for the churches of Galatia the apostle had no such praise. The difference was that, as bad as the Corinthian situation was, the major problem there (with the notable exception regarding resurrection; see 1 Cor. 15) did not pertain so much to right doctrine as to right living. In the Galatian churches, on the other hand, the very heart of the gospel was being undermined by false teachers. The gospel of grace was being trampled, and in its place was being offered the gospel of works, which is no gospel at all but a distortion of God’s truth (Gal. 1:6-7) that leads to damnation rather than salvation (Rom. 3:20). Galatians is not a detached theological treatise but a deeply personal letter written from the grieving heart of a godly man for his spiritual children, whose faith and living were being undermined by false teachers. His heart cry to the Galatian believers was, “It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery” (Gal. 5:1).
DOCTRINAL EMPHASIS
Paul had special concern for the believers of Galatia and was gravely distressed about the doctrinal dangers that threatened them. The Jewish leaders who stoned Paul at Lystra no doubt continued to intimidate and persecute Jewish converts in Galatia. They were implacable enemies of the gospel and were used by Satan to sow confusion and discord in those and many other infant churches.
An even greater danger, however, were Jews who had made a superficial profession of Christ but turned back to Judaism and sought to make Christianity an extension of their traditional system of works righteousness. Like the false teachers about whom Paul warned the Ephesian elders, the Judaizers arose from within the church itself, “speaking perverse things” and trying “to draw away the disciples after them” (Acts 20:30). The Judaizers were causing great confusion in the churches and were seriously distorting “the gospel of Christ” (Gal. 1:8). They taught that Gentiles must become Jews by circumcision before they could become Christians and that all Christians, Jewish and Gentile alike, were righteous before God only if they remained bound under the Mosaic laws, regulations, and ceremonies (see 2:3-5,11-14; 3:3-5; 4:8-11, 21-31; 5:1-4; 6:12-13). This danger had probably threatened the churches even while Paul was in Galatia, and it doubtlessly intensified after he left. “As we have said before, so I say again now,” the apostle reminded believers there, “if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to that which you received, let him be accursed” (Gal. 1:9; cf. w 6-8). In addition to teaching the necessity of being circumcised and of keeping the Mosaic law, the false teachers also attacked Paul personally, seeking to undercut his authority and thereby his doctrine. Consequently, he was careful to reaffirm his apostolic credentials. He begins the letter by referring to himself as “an apostle (not sent from men, nor through the agency of man, but through Jesus Christ, and God the Father)” (1:1). Throughout the first two chapters he continues to affirm his divine authority as an apostle of Jesus Christ, equal in every way to the Twelve, including Peter (see 1:12, 15-17; 2:2, 7-9). The theme of Galatians, and a central theme of the entire New Testament, is that true freedom comes only through Jesus Christ. In this letter Paul deals with spiritual freedom on two fronts. The first front (chaps. 3-4) is that of salvation, through which Christ sets a person free from bondage to sin and the law. As the apostle declares in the book of Romans, “The law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death” (8:2). Paul’s second front in Galatians (chaps. 5-6) is that of sanctification, the freedom God gives His children to live out lives of faithfulness and genuine righteousness, free from sin’s control and legalistic bondage.
BACKGROUND AND DESTINATION
 The name Galatia is derived from the barbaric Gauls, or Celts, who settled in Asia Minor after several centuries of plundering the Greek and Roman empires. Under Roman rule, the original region of Galatia was made part of a larger province by the same name in central Asia Minor (modern Turkey) that encompassed an area some 250 miles north to south and up to 175 miles from east to west. In Paul’s day the name Galatia was used for the original smaller region as well as the province. On the first missionary journey Paul and Barnabas established four churches in the southern part of the province, in the cities of Antioch, Iconium, Lystra, and Derbe (Acts 13:14-14:23), and those churches apparently came to form something of a regional body of believers. The Galatian epistle itself does not identify the specific local churches, but they were churches in which Paul had personally ministered (4:13-15). The fact that the book of Acts mentions the four churches established by Paul in south Galatia and mentions none in the rest of the province makes it probable that the epistle was addressed primarily to those southern churches. While in Galatia, Paul nearly lost his life, having been stoned and left for dead by antagonistic Jewish leaders who followed him from Antioch and Iconium to Lystra (Acts 14:19-20). After establishing a church in Derbe, Paul and Barnabas revisited the other three cities, “strengthening the souls of the disciples, encouraging them to continue in the faith” (14:22). On his second journey Paul visited the Galatian churches with Silas, “delivering the decrees, which had been decided upon by the apostles and elders who were in Jerusalem, for them to observe. So the churches were being strengthened in the faith, and were increasing in number daily” (Acts 16:1-5).
THE AUTHOR
 Paul, whose original name was Saul, was a native of Tarsus, a city in southeast Asia Minor not far from southern Galatia. He was raised in a strict Jewish family and was steeped in traditional Jewish legalism. He had been educated under the famous rabbi Gamaliel and carefully trained in Jewish law (Acts 22:3). He was “circumcised the eighth day, of the nation of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; as to the Law, a Pharisee; as to zeal, a persecutor of the church; as to the righteousness which is in the Law, found blameless” (Phil. 3:5-6). Before his conversion he “was advancing in Judaism beyond many of [his] contemporaries among [his] countrymen, being more extremely zealous for [his] ancestral traditions” (Gal. 1:14). Despite his strong legalism and traditionalism, Saul does not appear to have been a religious hypocrite, as were so many other Pharisees. He was spiritually blind and was an enemy of God and His people; but he was not hypocritical. He sincerely believed and adhered to traditional Judaism as God’s way of life for His chosen people. Like many other Jews of his day, Paul truly loved the traditional law and sincerely sought to keep every commandment, to observe every ceremony, and to offer every sacrifice that the covenant of Moses required. He was a legalist of the strictest kind, but he was honestly trying to please God by obeying what he thought was God’s will and does not seem to have been trying to impress others with his religiousness. Defending himself before the Sanhedrin, the apostle declared, “Brethren, I have lived my life with a perfectly good conscience before God up to this day” (Acts 23:1). Although by that time Paul had been a Christian for many years, the context suggests that his statement about having a good conscience before God included his life before conversion. When he persecuted Christians, causing many of them to be imprisoned and put to death (Acts 22:4-5; 26:10-11), he doubtlessly did so with the sincere conviction he was doing God’s will (see Acts 22:3). Although he “was formerly a blasphemer and a persecutor and a violent aggressor,” he nevertheless was “shown mercy, because [he] acted ignorantly in unbelief” (1 Tim. 1:13). Long before Saul of Tarsus became a zealous and dedicated legalist God “had set [him] apart even from [his] mother’s womb, and called [him] through His grace” (Gal. 1:15). The apostle spoke of legalism from firsthand experience, and he also spoke of grace from firsthand experience as well as from firsthand revelation. More than any other apostle he understood the bondage of the law and the freedom of grace.                                                                                                       MacArthur, John F (1987-11-08). Galatians MacArthur New Testament Commentary (Macarthur New Testament Commentary Serie) (Kindle Locations 178-189). Moody Publishers. Kindle Edition.
Martin Luther wrote:
The world bears the Gospel a grudge because the Gospel condemns the religious wisdom of the world. Jealous for its own religious views, the world in turn charges the Gospel with being a subversive and licentious doctrine, offensive to God and man, a doctrine to be persecuted as the worst plague on earth.
As a result we have this paradoxical situation: The Gospel supplies the world with the salvation of Jesus Christ, peace of conscience, and every blessing. Just for that the world abhors the Gospel.
These Jewish-Christian fanatics who pushed themselves into the Galatian churches after Paul's departure, boasted that they were the descendants of Abraham, true ministers of Christ, having been trained by the apostles themselves, that they were able to perform miracles.
In every way they sought to undermine the authority of St. Paul. They said to the Galatians: "You have no right to think highly of Paul. He was the last to turn to Christ. But we have seen Christ. We heard Him preach. Paul came later and is beneath us. It is possible for us to be in error--we who have received the Holy Ghost? Paul stands alone. He has not seen Christ, nor has he had much contact with the other apostles. Indeed, he persecuted the Church of Christ for a long time."
When men claiming such credentials come along, they deceive not only the naive, but also those who seemingly are well-established in the faith. This same argument is used by the papacy. "Do you suppose that God for the sake of a few Lutheran heretics would disown His entire Church? Or do you suppose that God would have left His Church floundering in error all these centuries?" The Galatians were taken in by such arguments with the result that Paul's authority and doctrine were drawn in question.
Against these boasting, false apostles, Paul boldly defends his apostolic authority and ministry. Humble man that he was, he will not now take a back seat. He reminds them of the time when he opposed Peter to his face and reproved the chief of the apostles.
Paul devotes the first two chapters to a defense of his office and his Gospel, affirming that he received it, not from men, but from the Lord Jesus Christ by special revelation, and that if he or an angel from heaven preach any other gospel than the one he had preached, he shall be accursed.

TABLE TALK
1.   DO YOU REMEMBER WHEN/WHERE YOU FIRST HEARD THE GOSPEL?  DO YOU REMEMBER WHAT YOU THOUGHT?
2.   CAN YOU COMPLETELY AND HONESTLY SAY YOU FEEL SAVED BY GRACE AND NOT BY WORKS?  DO YOU FEEL COMPLELLED TO DO WORKS?
3.   WHAT MOVES YOU TO WORKS?  EXPLAIN















Thursday, October 25, 2012

THE LORD’S SUPPER

THE LORD’S SUPPER

Excerpts taken from ‘The Lord’s Supper’ by Thomas Watson 1665
“A sacrament is a visible sermon.  And herein the sacrament excels the Word preached.  The Word is a trumpet to proclaim Christ, the sacrament is a glass to represent him… The Lord condescends to our weakness…God, to help our faith, does not only give us an audible Word, but a visible sign.”

The Mystery of the Lord’s Supper
The Greeks call the sacrament musterion: a mystery.

The Word is for engrafting, the sacrament for the confirming of faith.  The Word brings us to Christ, the sacrament builds us up in him. 
Et sensus fovetur, et fides firmatur’ [Sense is fed, and faith is strengthened].
  1. The Author of the Sacrament Is Jesus Christ.
Jesus took the bread.”  To institute sacraments belongs of right to Christ, and is a flower of his crown.
  1. It was when he had supped (Luke 22:20; ‘after supper’): which had this mystery in it, to show that the Sacrament is chiefly intended as a spiritual banquet; it is not to indulge the senses but to feed the graces.  It was ‘after supper’.
  2. Christ took bread also because of the analogy; bread did nearly resemble him: ‘I am that bread of life’ (John 6:48).
 Jesus took bread, and blessed it …and he took the cup, and gave thanks (Matt. 26:26-27).

  1. Christ’s blessing the elements was his giving thanks.  So it is in the Greek: Eucharistia; ‘He gave thanks.’
  2. Christ gave thanks that God had given these elements of bread and wine, not only to be signs but seals of our redemption.
  3. The third thing in the institution is the breaking of bread.  “He broke it.’  This did foreshadow Christ’s death and passion, with all the torments of his body and soul:  ‘It pleased the Lord to bruise him’ (Isa. 53:10).  When spices are bruised, then they send forth a sweet savour.  So when Christ was bruised on the cross, he did send out a most fragrant smell.  Christ body being crucified was the breaking open of a box of precious ointment, which did fill heaven and earth with its perfume.
  4. But how could Christ suffer, being God?  The Godhead is impassible.  Christ suffered only in his human nature, not the divine.  By simile: if one pours out water on red hot iron, the fire suffers from the water, and is extinguished, but the iron does not suffer.  So the human nature of Christ might suffer death, but the divine nature is not capable of any passion.  When Christ was, in the human nature, suffering, he was, in the divine nature, triumphing.
 The Benefits of the Lord’s Supper
My blood…is poured out……for the forgiveness of sins (Matt. 26:28).
This is a mercy of the first magnitude, the crowning blessing: ‘Who forgiveth all thine iniquities … who crowneth thee with lovingkindness’ (Psa. 103:3-4).  Whosoever has this charter granted is enrolled in the Book of Life: ‘Blessed is he whose transgression is forgiven’ (Psa 32:1). 

Christ’s Love Displayed in the Sacrament
This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many (Matt. 26:28).
  1. Behold the amazing love of Christ.  The cross, says St. Augustine, was a pulpit in which Christ preached his love to the world.
  2. It was wonderful love that Christ should suffer death.  ‘Lord,’ says Bernard, ‘thou hast loved me more than myself, for thou didst lay down thy life for me.’  That Christ should die as the ‘greatest sinner’ (Luther), having the weight of all men’s sins laid upon him, here was love usque ad stuporem dulcis (sweet to the point of astonishment).
  3. It was wonderful love that Christ should die for such as we are.  What are we?  Not only vanity, but enmity.  When we were fighting, he was dying; when we had the weapons in our hands, then he had the spear in his side (Rom. 5:8).
  4. It was wonderful love that Christ should rather die for us than for the angels that fell.  They were creatures of a more noble extract, and in all probability might have brought greater revenues of glory to God; yet that Christ should pass by those golden vessels, and make us clods of earth into stars of glory – Oh, the hyperbole of Christ’s love!
 The Broken Body of Christ
This is my body (Matt. 26:26).
  1. Was Christ’s body broken?  Then we may behold sin odious in the red glass of Christ’s sufferings.  It is true, sin is to be abominated because it turned Adam out of Paradise, and threw the angels down to hell.  Sin is the peace-breaker, it is like an incendiary in the family, that sets husband and wife at variance; it makes God fall out with us.  Sin is the womb of our sorrows, and the grave of our comforts.  But that which may most of all disfigure the face of sin, and make it appear ghastly, is this, it crucified our Lord: it made Christ veil his glory and lose his blood.
The Blood of Christ
This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins (Matt. 26:28).
Let us prize Christ’s blood in the sacrament.  It is ‘drink indeed’ (John 6:55).  ‘The grape cluster of my body was taken to the winepress of the cross for thy salvation, and from it was pressed the new wine of thy redemption’ (Bernard).
Christ’s blood is a reconciling blood.  Christ’s blood is the blood of atonement’.  Nay, it is not only a sacrifice, but a ‘propitiation’ (1 John 2:2).  Which denotes bringing us into favour with God.  It is one thing for a traitor to be pardoned, and another thing to be brought into favour.  Sin cut us off from God, Christ’s blood cements us to God.   Only the blood of Christ can ingratiate us into God’s favour, and make him look upon us with a smiling aspect.
  1. Christ’s blood is a quickening blood.  Whoso…drinketh my blood, hath eternal life’ (John 6:54); it both begets life, and prevents death.  Sure enough, the life of our soul is in the blood of Christ.
  2. Christ’s blood is a cleansing blood.  How much more shall the blood of Christ…purge your conscience?’ (Heb. 9:14).  As the merit of the blood of Christ pacifies God, so the virtue of it purifies us.  It is the King of Heaven’s bath.  ‘The blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin’ (1 John 1:7).  The Word of God is a looking glass, to show us our spots; and the blood of Christ is a fountain to wash them away (Zech. 13:1).
  3. Christ’s blood is a softening blood.  There is nothing so hard but it may be softened if it lie steeping in his blood; it will soften a stone.  The heart which before was like a piece hewn out of a rock, being steeped in Christ’s blood becomes soft, and the waters of repentance flow from it.
  4. Christ’s blood is a cooling blood. 
    1. It cools the heat of sin.  The heart naturally is full of distempered heat.  It burns in lust and passion; the blood of Christ allays this heat, it quenches the inflammation of sin.
    2. It cools the heat of conscience.  In time of desertion, conscience burns with the heat of God’s displeasure.  When the heart burns, and is in an agony, Christ’s blood is like water to the fire: it has a cooling and quenching virtue in it.
  5. Christ’s blood is a comforting blood.  It is best in affliction.  It cures the trembling of the heart.  The blood of Christ can make a prison become a palace.  It turned the martyrs’ flames into beds of roses:  ‘The martyrs are beaten, they rejoice; they die and behold they triumph.  Why?  Because, steeped in the blood of the cross, they do not fear death but hope for it.’  Christ’s blood gives comfort at the hour of death.
  6. Christ’s blood is a heaven-procuring blood.  ‘Through the side of Christ, he threw open to us the gateway to heaven’ (Bernard).  Our sins did shut heaven.  Christ’s blood is the key which opens the gate of paradise for us.  ‘We die through the tree of knowledge; we rise through the tree of the cross.’
 Self-Examination
But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup
(1 Cor. 11:28).
It is not enough to do what God has appointed, but as he appointed.  ‘Prepare your hearts unto the Lord’ (1 Sam. 7:3).  The musician first puts his instrument in tune before he plays.  The heart must first be prepared, and put in tune, before it goes to meet with God in this solemn ordinance of the sacrament.  Take heed of rashness and irreverence.  If we come not preparedly, we do not drink, but spill Christ’s blood, ‘Whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord’ (1 Cor. 11:27).  He that comes unpreparedly to the Lord’s Supper turns the cup in the sacrament into ‘a cup of fury’; ‘He changes the cup of blood into the cup of wrath.’

It is not enough that others think we are fit to come, but we must examine ourselves.  It is hard for a man to look inward, and see the face of his own soul.  But this probatory work is necessary:
v  If we do not examine ourselves, we are at a loss about our spiritual estate.
v  God will examine us.  It was a sad question the master of the feast asked, ‘Friend, how camest thou in hither, not having a wedding garment?’ (Matt. 22:12).  So it will be terrible, when God shall say to a man, ‘How camest thou in hither to my table with a proud, vain, unbelieving heart?  What has thou to do here in thy sins?  Thou pollutest my holy things. 
We would examine our sins, that they may be mortified; our wants, that they may be supplied; our graces, that they may be strengthened.
  1. We must come with serious hearts.  God knows every communicant, and if he sees any levity and indecency of spirit in us unworthy of his presence, he will be highly incensed, and send us away with the guilt of Christ’s blood, instead of the comfort of it.
  2. We must come with intelligent hearts.  There ought to be a competent measure of the knowledge, that we may ‘discern the Lord’s body’.  They that know not the mystery, feel not the comfort.  Some say they have good hearts, yet lack knowledge; we may as well call that a good eye which lacks sight.
  3. We must come to the sacrament with longing hearts.  We should say, as Christ, ‘With desire I have desired to eat this Passover’ (Luke 22:15).  Desires are the sails of the soul, which are spread to receive the gale of a heavenly blessing.
  4. If we would come prepared to this ordinance, we must come with penitent hearts, ‘whose souls have been pierced, though not with a sword’ (Augustine).  A broken Christ is to be received into a broken heart.  The more bitterness we taste in sin, the more sweetness we shall taste in Christ.
  5. We must come with sincere hearts.  Bad aims will spoil good actions.  What is our design in coming to the sacraments?  Is it that we may have more victory over our corruptions, and be more confirmed in holiness?  Then God will be good to us and heal us.
  6. If we would come rightly prepared to the sacrament we must come with humble hearts.  We see Christ humbling himself to the death; and will a humble Christ ever be received into a proud heart?  How humble should he be who is to receive an alms of free grace!  Humility was never a loser.  The emptier the vessel is, and the lower it is let down into the well, the more water it draws up; so the more the soul is emptied of itself, and the lower it is let down by humility, the more it fetches out of the well of salvation.  God will come into a humble heart to revive it (Isa. 57:15).  That is no part of Christ’s temple which is not built with a low roof.
  7. We must come with heavenly hearts.  The mystery of the sacrament is heavenly, what should an earthworm do here?  The sacrament is called koinonia, a ‘communion’ (1 Cor. 10:16).  What communion can an earthly man have with Christ?  An earthly man makes the world his god.  Then let him not think to receive another God in the sacrament.  Oh, let us be in the heavenly altitudes, and by the wings of grace ascend.
  8. We must come with believing hearts.  Christ gave the sacrament to the Apostles principally as they were believers.  Such as come faithless, go away fruitless.  So that, because faith is humble, and gives all the glory to Christ, and free grace, hence it is God that has put so much honor upon it.  This is the golden bucket that draws water out of the well of life.
  9. We must come to the Lord’s table with charitable hearts.  Christ’s blood was shed to reconcile us, not only to God, but one to another.  Christ’s body was broken to make up the breaches among Christians.  He that does not come in charity to the sacrament has nothing of God in him, for ‘God is love’ (1 John 4:8).
  10. We must come hither with praying hearts.  Every ordinance, as well as every creature, is ‘sanctified by…prayer’ (1 Tim. 4:5).  When we send the dove of prayer to heaven, it brings an olive leaf in its mouth.  Many seem so distracted with worldly cares that they can scarce spare any time for prayer before they come to the sacrament.  Do they think the tree of blessing will drop its fruit into their mouth when they never shook it by prayer?  God does not set his mysteries as so low a rate as to cast them away upon those that do not seek them (Ezek. 36:37).
 We see how we are to be qualified in our approaches to the Lord’s table.  Thus coming, we shall meet with embraces of mercy.  We shall have not only a representation, but a participation, of Christ in the sacrament; we shall carry away not only panis [bread] but salutaris [healing]; we shall be ‘filled with all the fullness of God’ (Eph. 3:19).

OUR PRAYER

Lord, all I have is thine.  My head shall be thine to study for thee; my hands shall be thine to work for thee; my heart shall be thine to adore thee; my tongue shall be thine to praise thee!